Free Settler or Felon?

Convicts of the Royal Sovereign 1835

F

 

A  B  C  D  E  F  G  H  I  J  K  L  M  N  O  P  Q  R  S  T  U  V  W  X  Y Z

   

George Filewood

George Filewood was a brother of James Filewood, also a convict on the Royal Sovereign. George was a boot maker aged 29 with a sallow pock-pitted complexion, brown hair and grey eyes. He had lost his front upper tooth.  He was tried at Middlesex in 1834 and convicted of stealing boots from his employer.

From the London Times:

Marlborough Street - Yesterday George Filewood, a journeyman in the employ of Mr. Lloyd, boot and shoe maker No. 30 Coventry Street, Haymarket was brought up for final examination, charged with having plundered his employer at different times of a vast quantity of property, and Susannah Filewood, his wife, was charged with Having received the property, well knowing it to have been stolen.

Upwards of 2- pawnbrokers were in attendance with portions of the stolen property, one of whom had no less than 38 pairs of boots and shoes in his possession, pledged by the prisoner and his accomplices, and by means of the pawn brokers between 100 and 150 pairs of boots and shoes were brought forward and identified by Mr. Lloyd.

The prisoner had been somewhere about 18months in his service and from the dates of some of the pledges it was quite evident he had commenced robbing his master shortly after he got into his employ. The stock of Mr. Lloyd being very extensive afforded peculiar facilities to the prisoner to commit depredations and likewise to render detection almost impossible. Suspicion, however, did arise against the prisoner in consequence of his having been seen with a check in his possession, and his having offered to lend a considerable sum of money to his fellow workmen. These circumstances, coupled with others of a general nature, led to the detection of the extensive system of robbery carried on by him for so long a time with impunity.

Stephen Smith, shop man to Mr. Lloyd, said his suspicions having been awakened, he determined to watch his movements closely. On the Thursday before his apprehension he saw the prisoner attempt to put a pair of boys shoes into his trousers pocket, but upon observing that witness had his eye upon him he threw the shoes down again. On Friday he again tried to pocket another pair of shoes, but these he put down as soon as he saw witness watching him. On Saturday he took a pair of gentleman's pumps from a heap on the floor and unperceived, as he imagined, put them into his pocket. Witness went up to him and asked him if he had any shoes in his pocket to which the prisoner replied "Certainly not". Witness then mentioned to him what he had seen, and the prisoner admitted he had put a pair of umps in his pockets, but asserted they were old ones. Ultimately he produced a pair of new pumps from his pockets, begging forgiveness and saying he hoped witness would not tell Mr. Lloyd, and that he might go home and be safe and rest happy. Witness mentioned the circumstance to Mr. Lloyd on the following Monday who caused the prisoner be taken  into custody.

Policeman C177 said he went to 3 St. Albans place Lambeth where the prisoner lodged and there found a pair of boots and a pair of shoes which Mr. Lloyd identified. A duplicate for another pair belonging to Mr. Lloyd was also identified. A more minute investigation being instituted, the property already specified was found in the hands of the pawnbrokers, pledged by the two prisoners and a person not in custody.

The cases of seven of the pawnbrokers were considered to be sufficient, and their evidence only was taken. The greater part of the others applied for permission to give up the property which was not refused.

The prisoners were ordered to stand fully committed but they were directed to be brought up on the following week for a purpose connected with the same offence.

Mr. Lloyd begged leave to put a question to the male prisoner respecting a large sum of money which he understood was in his possession.

Mr. Conant said Mr. Lloyd might, if he pleased put the question, but he must caution the prisoner not to make any reply which would criminate himself, because he need not answer it if he chose.

Mr. Lloyd then asked the prisoner if he had not a considerable sum of money in his possessions, as he had been informed that he the prisoner had offered to lend one of the workmen 20 pound.

The prisoner said he had no money whatever.

Mr. Lloyd then inquired about a check which he had got changed.

The prisoner gave an explanation which Mr. Lloyd said he should be able on a future day to prove was untrue. By advice of their solicitor, the prisoners declined saying anything further, and were removed London Times 12 July 1834. 4a

George Filewood was assigned to James Atkinson at Parramatta. His Ticket of leave was issued in 1840 however in 1848 he was sentenced to six months in the iron gang after being convicted at Sydney Quarters Sessions of stealing silver money in a dwelling.

 

James Filewood

James Filewood was a hairdresser convicted of receiving stolen goods. He was Assigned to H. Delion, Sydney. A Ticket of leave was issued in 1840 and cancelled in the same year for disorderly conduct. He married Ann Willis in 1841.

 


 

Robert Filling was a twenty five year old widower from Wiltshire and was employed as a Letter sorter. He had no prior convictions and could read and write. He received a life sentence for stealing hay.

A Ticket of Leave was granted in 1845.


 

Robert Fitch -

Nineteen-year old Suffolk farm labourer Robert Fitch was convicted of housebreaking at Suffolk Quarter Session on 8th April 1835

On arrival he was assigned to John Marquett Blaxland at Patrick Plains and was issued with a Ticket of Leave for the district of Cassilis in 1842.

Robert Fitch was a witness a at the trial of Thomas Grantham in 1844. Grantham had been indicted for forgery in having uttered forged orders at Jerry's Plains in August 1843 with intent to defraud Richard Alcorn. Fitch testified on Grantham's behalf, stating that although he could not read well he knew it to be a 2 pound cheque on the Commercial Bank. The Maitland Mercury recorded that Fitch was examined by the Attorney General, who elicited a very humorous spelling from him on the cheque. http://trove.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/665174

 


 

George Fitness

Married indoor servant and groom convicted at Central Criminal Court in 1835.

William Taylor and George Fitness were indicted for stealing on the 22nd March, 5 curtains, value 12s; 1 decanter, value 2s 6d; 6 glasses, value 9s 4 cups value 6d; 4 saucers value 6d; 3 knives, value 6d; 3 forks, value 6d; 3 spoons value 3d; 3 brushes, value 2s; 1 curry comb value 6d and 1 lamp, value 6d; the goods of Richard Keily, the master of the said William Taylor.

William Pearce. I am a policeman. On 22nd March at 10 o'clock at night, I was in Cockspur street, Charing cross about a quarter of a mile from the prosecutor's I met Fitness carrying this carpet bag, with this property in it I asked him what he was carrying he said his masters clothes - I asked him where he brought it from - he said from a house in Pall Mall - I asked him the number of the house in Pall Mall; he could not tell me I said then I should take him to the station house - he said rather than go there he would go back to the house he had brought it from - as we returned he said he brought it from No 6 Pall Mall - we went down Pall Mall and found that was false - I told him I should not leave him till I saw whether he ws right or wrong  - he then took me to No. 6 Cleveland row which is the prosecutors - he rang the area bell and Taylor came up the area steps to answer the bell - I said I have stopped this man with a carpet bag, which he says is his master's clothes, and that his master has been dining here' Taylor said,' It is quite right, I am sorry you detained him, he ought to have been home by this time with his master's clothes; the servant girl came up and also said it was right I said, 'Then I shall let him go; he got about twelve yards form the house when the prosecutor came out of the street door, and asked what was the matter I told him, and he said, "I know nothing about a carpet bag; where is the man" I said, "There he goes" he hearing me speak to Mr. Keily, turned into Russell Court. I followed but could not see him - I ran to the end of James Street, but could not find him - returned, and said I believed he had escaped (the gentleman said the court was no thoroughfare, and he must be there - I returned again and called brother officer to come wit his lantern, and at last I saw him run - I pursued after him he was making his way across St. James street, - a man stopped him - I took him back to the court and asked him for the bag he was carrying - he said he knew nothing of any bag - it was found and brought to me - I took possession of it - I detained him till Mr. Keily brought Taylor there in custody - the bag was locked - it was broken open and the articles, named in the indictment, found in it - the spoons are not silver.

Cross examined by Mr. Doane

Q. Was Mr. Keily present when the bag was opened. A. he was. Fitness was flurried when I stopped him - Cleveland row is nearly in a line with Pall Mall the female servant also said, it was all right - I am quite certain Fitness is the man.

Mr. Richard Keily. I live in Cleveland row. Taylor was my footman he had been so between three or four months - I know nothing of Fitness - my attention was attracted by the conversation with the officer, and as so many robberies had been committed about that time I was determined to see about it - I said no gentleman had dined at my house that day - the moment Fitness heard me speak, he took to his heels and went down the court, - I knew he could not get out of the court it being no thoroughfare - he was taken at last, and I took Taylor to the station house - the property in the bag is mine some of it I swear positively to and believe it all to be mine.

Cross examined Q. What can you swear positively to. A. The glass was cut to match some I had of the same pattern, and the number corresponds with what is missing - I had not seen the curtains for a month - I missed none of my plate but a tea spoon and two dessert spoons - Taylor had the care of my plate the bag is not mine

William Baker. I am a policeman. I heard the alarm; I took Taylor into custody, concealed behind the back kitchen door in the house.

Taylor Guilty. Aged 30 - transported for fourteen years

Fitness Guilty. Aged 27 - transported for seven years.

George Fitness was assigned to George Cox at Penrith. He died in 1837 in Windsor Hospital


 

James Flower was born in Frome, Somerset. He was employed as a clothier and was convicted of housebreaking when he was 19.  He received a life sentence and was incarcerate in Illchester Prison to await transportation  

  Illchester prison

 

 

Robert Fry -

Farm labourer convicted of stealing cheese at Wiltshire Assizes. His description was given as - sallow complexion with dark brown hair. He was assigned to James Adair at Paterson and received a Ticket of Leave for the Paterson district in 1843. A Conditional Pardon was granted in 1848.

Robert Fry came to the rescue of Mary Dobson near Edward Gostwyck Cory's estate at the Upper Paterson in June 1846 when aboriginal Tommy Tombo attempted to rape her. She had been walking through the bush picking tea tree for a broom when she was attacked. Robert Fry heard her cries for help and came to her assistance.

In 1849 he was found not guilty of stealing tobacco from the factory of Alfred William Phillips at Bona Vista. Witness at his trial was Thomas Bellamy.

 

 

© Free Settler or Felon

 

 
Users Online
 

web counter